
Last modified: 2010-10-08 by jarig bakker
Keywords: holy roman empire |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
image by Jaume Ollé
Emperor's Banner until 1401
Starting around the 14th century, the Empire had a diet called the Reichstag
(early it had a somewhat similar gathering called the Hofstag).
Although it never had the power to adopt, as opposed to proposing, it had
considerable de facto authority during the late middle ages. During
and after the 30 Years War, it basically lost most of its power. It had
something over 200 members (called Reichstände) which were princes,
bishops or Imperial cities. The last completely regular Reichstag
was in the mid 17th century. The following one, the Reichstag of
1663 did not adjourn until the abolition of the Empire in 1806. Despite
appearances, this was accompanied by increasing irrelevence of the institution
although it continued meeting irregularly in Regensburg [Bavaria].
With the foundation of the German League,
its diet which consisted of the princes was named the Bundestag
Norman Martin, 5 October 2000
1. The Reichssturmfahne was not a flag, but a banner. Meyer's Lexikon
of 1897 says s. v. Banner:
"On the German Imperial Banner, which the Emperor or the supreme commander
appointed by him mounted, when assembling the Imperial army, was depicted
at the time of Henry I and Otto the Great the archangel Michael, at the
time of Frederic I (Barbarossa) an eagle, in the time of Otto IV an eagle
hovering over a dragon, since the time of Sigmund, and perhaps earlier,
the Imperial eagle; that was a black eagle in yellow, bearing the arms
of the Emperors house on it's breast.
When investing a fief, the Emperor had together with this Imperial
banner in black and yellow a second banner in red for the investion with
penal judicature. This is probably the reason of combining the colours
black, red and yellow to form a tricolor against the rules of heraldry....
The Reichssturmfahne was smaller than the Imperial banner, more like
a chaffron..."
Since this Reichssturmfahne was part of the arms of the Duchy of Wuerttemberg
since 1495 and of the royal house of Wuerttemberg up to 1918, we have 19th
century pictures of it.
2. I don't think it wise to have the Holy Roman Empire sub GERMANY,
since the Empire was an supranational entity, Germany being only the most
important of its successor states. These successor states are in full:
Germany, the Czech Republic, Austria, Liechtenstein, Switzerland (independent
since 1648), Italy (except the southern parts), San Marino, Monaco, Luxemburg,
Belgium and the Netherlands (independent since 1648).
Big parts of the Empire belong now to France and Poland, small parts
to Slovenia and Croatia. Mark: East and West Prussia as well as Venice
where not part of the Empire. That means, in the late middle ages it embraced
all territory between the Rhone , Saone and Maas (Meuse) in the west to
the Oder valley in the East, and from Holstein in the North to Tuscany
in the south.
Legaly there was no GERMANY and no King of Germany. Even the title
German King was very rarely used. The official title was up to the 11th
century Rex Francorum (King of the Francs) and later Rex Romanorum (King
of the Romans). The latter title was used in the interval between election
and coronation at Rome or for sons of an Emperor, when they were elected
kings in their fahthers lifetime. Because the German king was in fact Rex
Francorum, he was elected by the peoples of the eastern part of the Kingdom
of the Francs, living in the dukedoms of Eastern Franconia, Frisia, Saxonia,
Thuringia, Bavaria, Alemannia (Suebia) and
Bohemia. Later they were represented by the seven princely electors,
one of which was the King of Bohemia.
As an example: Karl IV, duke of Luxemburg and King of Bohemia, educated
at the court of the of French king, was elected king in 1346 at Rhens and
crowned king at Bonn (again in 1349 at the correct place Aachen/Aix). By
this act he was legally king of Italy and Burgundy and had the right to
be crowned Emperor at Rome. 1355 he was crowned as king of Italy in Milano
and as Roman Emperor at Rome, 1365 as king of Burgundy at Arles (Provence).
Since 1508 the Imperial title was Elected Roman Emperor. The only place
of coronation was in modern times Aachen.
3. Organs of the Empire were the Emperor, the Electors, the Reichstag
(diet), and since about 1520 the Imperial circles. The circles were responsible
for defence, trunk roads, and other things of common interest. The Reichstag
had is sessions from 1594 at Regensburg and was permanent since 1664. The
states (Stände) were then represented by comissioners. Hereditary
Imperial commissioner was the Prince of Thurn and Taxis, better known to
the public as Imperial postmaster general.
The circles had diets of their own. At the Reichtsag Italian states
were not represented, but in modern times some Burgundianstates (Duchy
of Savoya, Archbishop and Imperial City of Besançon, Principality of Mombeliard
etc.).
4. The cross was a common symbol of Christian states, and especially
of the Holy Empire. The Meyer says: "The banner of the Holy Empire bore
a cross even before 1200; it is the st. George's banner... Emperor Friedrich
III took the cross officially as part of the Imperial arms, but some of
his successors did not use it." So you can find the cross on thousands
of pictures. Most Imperial cities had it in their arms. So it was quite
normal for the Imperial city of Genova to use it (see
Genoa).
A. Birken, 22 Aug 2002
image sent by A. Birken, 22 Aug 2002
Nevertheless the Emperor had a banner, consisting of a black eagle,
armed red, generally on a gold (yellow) field. Sometimes the same eagle
is portrayed on a white field; a flag chart early in the 18th century has
the yellow flag as the flag of the emperor and the white one as that of
the empire, but it is uncertain as to whether this represents a real distinction.
After 1400, the eagle became two-headed; possibly this reflected the practice
of the defunct Byzantine Empire, their
main competitor to the claim to being the Roman Empire. Increasingly, but
not uniformly, the eagle acquired a sword and orb, as well as a crown.
The coat of arms, but rarely the banner, also sometimes had a red border.
A good representation of the early pattern can be found in Crampton
1990. I found some nice 15th century representations in a small book
called Kaiser Heinrichs Romfahrt (Emperor Henry's Pilgrimage), published
in Koblenz in 1895; Smith 1975
has one of these illustrations on p.114.
Norman Martin, 14 Jan 1998
image by Erwin Hoheisel, 29 Aug 2007
The history of the Holy Roman Empire begins not 962 under the reign
of Otto I. the Great, it starts with the imperial coronation of Charlemagne
on 25 December 800 at Rome. From 800 until 1165 the name of the empire
was only "Roman Empire" (Imperium Romanum) as a restoration of the
ancient Roman Empire. From 1165 until 1486 the state name was "Holy Roman
Empire" (Sacrum Romanorum Imperium = correct: Holy Empire of the
Romans) because on 29 December 1165 Charlemagne was declared "holy" by
the Pope Paschalis III. Since Maximilian I. (1486-1519) until 6 August
1806 the state name was "Holy Roman Empire of German Nation" (Sacrum
Romanorum Imperium Nationis Germanicae = correct: Holy Empire of the
Romans by German Nation). In German language: Heiliges Reich der Römer
Deutscher Nation or in the shorter version: Heiliges Römisches Reich
Deutscher Nation).
Erwin Hoheisel, 29 Aug 2007
image by Erwin Hoheisel, 29 Aug 2007
image by Erwin Hoheisel, 29 Aug 2007
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 15 Aug 2008
Flag of Holy Roman Empire: version 1737.
Description of flag: It is a horizontal 11-stripes flag with alternating
blue yellow and white stripes of equal width. The double headed black eagle,
which is topped by a golden crown is superimposing the stripes and shifted
to the hoist.
It was said to be the flag of Emperor Karl VI. (1711-1740, kin of Habsburg).
Source: Jörg M. Hormann and Dominik Plaschke: “Deutsche Flaggen:
Geschichte – Tradition – Verwendung”, ISBN 3-89225-555-5, p.18
Klaus-Michael Schneider, 15 Aug 2008
Please add as primary source: [sig12]
either flagchart 18 row 1 column 2 or flagchart 42 row 4 column 1 (flags
have no numbers; therefore I have ordered them by position). The flag is
depicted in both flagcharts. The latter is the better.
Klaus-Michael Schneider, 10 Sep 2008
image by Jaume Ollé
Two additional flags associated with the Empire worth mentioning are
the Sankt Georg Fahne - a white St. George's cross on a red field
frequently with a Schwenkel - (Smith
1975, p.115, labels this the Imperial War Flag) and the Reichsturmfahne.
Norman Martin, 14 Jan 1998
Even though I found no reference to the Sankt Georg Flagge as war flag
except in Smith 1975, it is clear
that its primary use was military and in view of Smith's identification,
I would not be surprised if it were sometimes or even frequently called
Reichskriegsflagge.
Norman Martin, 15 Mar 2000
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
Mercenary Company flags (Holy Roman Empire) 17th century - Unterpfälzisches
Regiment zu Fuß Waldmannshausen (1620)
Accroding to source this regiment was divided into at least 10 companies.
The image of the 6th company is given, the flags of the companies 7, 8,
9 and 10 are described.
[neu39a] mentions, that this
type is very seldom. The companies of this regiment all have the same pattern
but the colours are varied. So having the same pattern, the flags can be
reconstructed.
All companies of this regiment had a flag with ratio est. 4:5 and had
been divided per bend.
The flags of companies 1 to 5 are not described. Probably the basic
colour of 1st company was white (colonel), but there is no proof.
Source: Fahnen und Flaggen. Eine bunte Fibel, by Ottfried
Neubecker, 1939 [neu39a], p.26-27
Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
There are several places called Moncontour in France. The Battle of
Moncontour took place near the village of Moncontour (1,008 inhabitants
in 2006), located in the department of Vienne, historical province of Poitou.
The battle was of short duration but particularly bloody: the Huguenots
lost 6,000 men (nearly one third of their troops), while the Catholics
lost "only" 600 men. Henri III then bore the title of the Duke of Anjou.
An engraving representing the Battle of Moncontour (with flags) is
available here.
The original is shown at the Georges Turpin Museum, Parthenay.
Another representation of the battle, in colours (with flags), is available
here.
A detailed account of the battle is available here
(in French).
Ivan Sache, 24 Jun 2009
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
Ducal regiment flag: The ratio was approx 11:19 plus an embowed end
added to the fly. The hoist consists of diamonds of the colours blue, red,
yellow and white. The fly consists of nine horitontal stripes in
order: yellow-blue-red-yellow-red-blue-white-yellow-red. One single red
diamond is superimposed by a small white cross like that one of Schwyz
canton, but in this case it is the ensign of the alliance of Huguenots.
Source: [neu32], p.31, image
no.98
Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
Ducal cavalry flag: It is a triangular pennant, mainly white but with
blue, black and yellow pieces of cloth. The white cross of the alliance
of Huguenots is placed into the upper blue piece of cloth.
Source: [neu32], p.31, image
no.99
Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
Regiment Hohengeroldseck: The ratio was approx 11:19 plus an embowed
end added to the fly. The hoist was yellow, flamed five times horizontally
red. The fly was red with the white cross of the alliance of Huguenots
in its centre. The regiment was lead by count Quirin Gangolf of Hohengeroldseck,
which was a small territory in the Black Forrest. The count was colonel
of 15 companies and in service of Wolfgang of Palatinate-Zweibrücken. The
flags of all companies were red and yellow with the white cross. The patterns
of the companies were different.
Sources: [neu32], p.31 , image
no.100; [neu39a], p.27
Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
image by Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009
Regiment Granweiler: The ratio was approx 11:19 plus an embowed end
added to the fly. It was a 7-stripes flag, divided horizontally with ratio
1:1:1:3:1:1:1. The central stripe was red with with the white cross of
the alliance of Huguenots in its centre. The others were from top to bottom:
red-yellow-mixed - mixed-blue-white.
The mixed stripes were divided horizontally twice into:blue-red-yellow-white(upper)
and white-yellow-red-blue(lower). I got no information about Granweiler.
Sources: [neu39a], p.27
Klaus-Michael Schneider, 24 Jun 2009